![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUd1ZOxhHW6qKyKV3FNY4kGkJJjun384S2sCrTNbemACNWuUi03gQv0QQ1bH5Mlct6Gx8HKNEQULIUbHVnHX50D6mz5Iop2qOtde5aPCKN6_pb2NDaCRx7WJdBpwDn_jLTKr5HHb5V3q1B/s320/Briancooney-4570.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi6yY534ygvgkGiJienoTBFFgpWL7A5DFZ7szqhIWCfE4O_duXqn9GPSo7oEMXAXU5n5ABUXq0SpcC-dLqOOFWlVYiL9x8ASK-QTTkzIwa2rZOk0uGPDvBKqoq82trueoEvTW9jlprwXNLZ/s320/Briancooney-4569.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhpdCyZmp_kC1d6zkZ8eENKR_4R6mKmCdTRBWKwhj9ilQ1l8cK5FfmdxUd96Ruy2wZ_7Vit3wuaeKHB4yQqxkrJMWqT-SdXka9EKpgRtB9Ea4sd4QyiS3k55_lXt8h4nUhbdVtHjhnuyusR/s320/Briancooney-4568.jpg)
Its easier to see the fall off in light between the first and last photo. On zooming in more noise can be seen also.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh2CVmnIRMqhMlJkge-VNihgeJ3txCDwdYiAKm68vfUByZZZO_3U_e8ohUCJ9ThHWn_92Y7ycrxNXetGg_TZtzAEHExd4Ogd9LJO7l28Jdz03YMTMpZeXoMqHudVlj1ytI5e4B6pFZPdlYd/s320/Briancooney-4430.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiT-BCWtXdQ8jNpbFeeGmbydVGufFYNpKLku-QEKSJjNLnBBypwafXRxZqcG-2KRI7dtiR1FHef4eRuHuHhUi3tYoc8kFycJwi0ClzFZubchXLNRWLADBp0YnUkeHnM-BTfjwIgw_Bbiq4y/s320/Briancooney-4432.jpg)
The photo on the left is taken without a graduated filter and the one on the right was taken with one. Both were taken at f 14 and 1/60th of a second and ISO 100. The second photo is an improvement, there is more cloud detail in the sky.
One thing I have noticed with graduated filters is that in some situations noise is more pronounced. I am not certain whether that is because of the amount of graduation, perhaps the higher the f stop difference the increase in dynamic range causes noise?
No comments:
Post a Comment